316: Rhetorical Features of the Controversy Paper Format I. Introduction a. Introduce your topic b. Thesis statement (explain why you selected this

316: Rhetorical Features of the Controversy Paper Format

I. Introduction
a. Introduce your topic
b. Thesis statement (explain why you selected this topic)
c. Purpose statement (why does investigating this topic matter)
d. Preview main points for analysis

II. Methodology

a. Methodological framework: describe rhetorical criticism
b. Why is rhetorical crit the best framework for analysis of your controversy
c. Describe the method of analysis you used; content analysis, media analysis, critical

theory, etc.

III. Analysis
a. Rhetorical features – identify and explain the rhetorical features of your controversy

i. Power
ii. Spheres

iii. Distrust
iv. Ideographs

b. Rhetorical strategy
i. Explain how the rhetorical features of your controversy work in the public

sphere
ii. What messaging have you discovered is favored, conveyed, promoted through

the rhetorical features you examined.

IV. Conclusion
a. Remind readers of your thesis
b. Remind readers of your purpose for exploring this phenomenon
c. Succinctly review each of your main points showing readers how they all fit together;

how does an understanding of the rhetorical features of your controversy help you
situate your controversy for further investigation

d. Tell readers what is different now that you have undertaken this research project; what
has changed?

Format requirements:
*APA (including cover page, abstract, and references)
*In text citations
*Papers will be submitted through SafeAssign

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

chrck file NAME: Political Science 2041 (online) U.S. National Government Dr. Paul A.

chrck file NAME: Political Science 2041 (online) U.S. National Government Dr. Paul A. Labedz COMPUTER-BASED LEARNING ACTIVITY Directions: Use the Internet to answer the following questions concerning the United States House of Representatives as well as questions regarding the personal, professional, and legislative background of one of its members. Note:

 Hide Submission Folder InformationInstructions Review on forward and backward mapping. Considering the “Community-First Public Safety” case study, and

 Hide Submission Folder InformationInstructions Review on forward and backward mapping. Considering the “Community-First Public Safety” case study, and the articles on different ways of approaching policy analysis, in a (longer) policy memo for the mayor, first discuss what problem the several programs/components (Reimagining Public Safety in Saint Paul) are addressing

 Considering the “Community-First Public Safety” case study, and the articles on different ways of approaching policy analysis, in a second policy memo

 Considering the “Community-First Public Safety” case study, and the articles on different ways of approaching policy analysis, in a second policy memo for the mayor, first discuss what problem the several programs/components (Reimagining Public Safety in Saint Paul) are addressing (be as specific as possible in defining the problem-and is